<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stephen Bolen &#187; Kindle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbolen.me/tag/kindle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbolen.me</link>
	<description>UX Designer &#38; Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon: a HTML5 Cheerleader</title>
		<link>http://sbolen.me/2011/10/21/amazon-a-html5-cheerleader/</link>
		<comments>http://sbolen.me/2011/10/21/amazon-a-html5-cheerleader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tumblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbolen.me/2011/10/21/amazon-a-html5-cheerleader/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that Amazon is ditching its old format for a more Web-friendly one is a sign that it intends to make the e-reading experience one that&#8217;s more akin to Web pages in general. The use of CSS3 gives publishers a whole new toolkit for laying out and designing e-books, and one that utilizes the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The fact that Amazon is ditching its old format for a more Web-friendly one is a sign that it intends to make the e-reading experience one that&#8217;s more akin to Web pages in general. The use of CSS3 gives publishers a whole new toolkit for laying out and designing e-books, and one that utilizes the familiar and relatively simple syntax of stylesheets for the Web.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sbolen.me/2011/10/21/amazon-a-html5-cheerleader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do eBooks cost so much?</title>
		<link>http://sbolen.me/2011/01/16/why-do-ebooks-cost-so-much/</link>
		<comments>http://sbolen.me/2011/01/16/why-do-ebooks-cost-so-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tumblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbolen.me/2011/01/16/why-do-ebooks-cost-so-much/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fascinating look at the pricing structure for eBooks and digital readers. I&#8217;ve often wondered why eBooks are more expensive at times than their hard and soft-cover counterparts&#8230; now I know.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating look at the pricing structure for eBooks and digital readers. I&#8217;ve often wondered why eBooks are more expensive at times than their hard and soft-cover counterparts&#8230; now I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sbolen.me/2011/01/16/why-do-ebooks-cost-so-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the Kindle will fail</title>
		<link>http://sbolen.me/2008/05/15/why-the-kindle-will-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://sbolen.me/2008/05/15/why-the-kindle-will-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscriptions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenbolen.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before Amazon launched the Kindle, I was asked if the Sports Cartel would like to participate as a launch partner with Amazon and provide RSS feeds from our sports blogs for Kindle subscribers.  I spoke with a very enthusiastic Amazon Kindle team member who explained the pricing model, the device and what kind of revenue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before Amazon launched the Kindle, I was asked if the Sports Cartel would like to participate as a launch partner with Amazon and provide RSS feeds from our sports blogs for Kindle subscribers.  I spoke with a very enthusiastic Amazon Kindle team member who explained the pricing model, the device and what kind of revenue we could expect to receive in return for the per subscriber model.</p>
<p>When I hung up the phone, I started to run the numbers:</p>
<p>Kindle MSRP:  <strong>$399.00</strong></p>
<p>Subscriptions, per month:</p>
<ul>
<li>Cost per syndicated blog: up to <strong>$.99</strong></li>
<li>Cost per newspaper: <strong>$9.99 &#8211; $13.99</strong> (major papers)</li>
<li>Cost per magazine: <strong>$1.25 &#8211; $2.49</strong> (major magazines)</li>
<li>Cost per book: <strong>$9.99</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>It just didn&#8217;t add up.  I couldn&#8217;t figure out how these devices would actually sell.  You pay $400 for the privilege to lug around a fairly ugly 4-color grayscale device that displays blog feeds, newspapers, magazines and books that you still have to pay for?  No thanks.  The Kindle is, to all intents and purposes, a one-dimensional device.  A one-dimensional device with a hefty price tag.</p>
<p>You can imagine my surprise when I saw a Michael Arrington post on TechCruch, where Citigroup Analyst Mark Mahaney <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="TechCrunch: That's a lot of Kindles!" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/14/amazon-may-sell-750-million-in-kindles-by-2010-thats-a-lot-of-kindles/">forecasted that Amazon could generate $400M to $750M in revenue from the Kindle by 2010</a>.</p>
<p>Those figures would represent roughly 1% &#8211; 3% of Amazon&#8217;s total yearly revenue.</p>
<p>In my humble opinion, there&#8217;s no way that Amazon will sell that many Kindles and generate that kind of revenue.  </p>
<p>No. Way.  </p>
<p>For starters, there&#8217;s the subscription-based model.  While I can certainly understand why someone would want to load up a Kindle with blog feeds, newspapers and e-books (really, who are we trying to fool?), the recurring cost becomes a serious barrier after months of use.</p>
<p>Just looking at my Google Reader, I subscribe to about 60 blogs.  Take that times <strong>$.99</strong>, and I&#8217;m suddenly spending <strong>$59.40</strong> per month to read things I already get <em>for free</em>.  Keep in mind this is <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">only</span></em> blog usage.  Let&#8217;s say I want to order the <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="Armageddon in Retrospective" href="http://www.amazon.com/Armageddon-Retrospect-Kurt-Vonnegut/dp/0399155082/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1210862185&amp;sr=8-1">new Kurt Vonnegut book</a> at <strong>$9.99</strong> and read the <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="New York Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/">New York Times</a> at <strong>$13.99</strong> per month in addition to the blog feeds&#8230; I would have just spent <strong>$482.38</strong> (<strong>$83.38</strong> for the content and <strong>$399.00</strong> for the Kindle) <span style="text-decoration: underline;">in the first month of owning the device</span>, of which <strong>$73.39</strong> was subscription-based.  Subscriptions that I could have pulled up on an <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="iPhone" href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">iPhone</a> (in color, no less) for the flat-rate cost of the <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="iPhone rate plan" href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/easysetup/rateplans.html">rate plan</a> and iPhone.  </p>
<p>But what of this Apple technology, you say?</p>
<p>In order to make the &#8220;<em>up to $750M!</em>&#8221; prediction somewhat valid, Citigroup&#8217;s Mahaney applied some *extremely* fuzzy logic, as pointed out by Arrington:</p>
<blockquote><p>Citi took this indirect sales data and built a model based on the adoption curve of the iPod <em>“Here’s what’s known. Launched in CQ4:01, the iPod went from 129,000 unit sales in its first quarter to becoming a mass market phenomenon, with a current installed base of approximately 100MM.”</em></p>
<p>They apply similar adoption rates to the Kindle that the iPod saw (starting at a much lower base: 129,000 iPods v. 10,000 &#8211; 30,000 Kindles in first three months on the market) and then discount the entire model by 50% &#8211; 75% to hedge risk in coming up with the three year revenue model. <em>“So perhaps, if Amazon executes right with its Kindle product and marketing strategy, the iPod analogy for the Kindle won’t be too far stretched,”</em> Mahaney says.</p></blockquote>
<div>Let me make one thing abundantly clear: <strong><span style="color: #800000;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">the Kindle is no iPod</span></span></strong>.  And it&#8217;s not even close.  Discount the model all you want, but the math is still very, very fuzzy.  As Spock would say, that&#8217;s highly illogical.  Hopefully the potential <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="AMZN on Google Finance" href="http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&amp;q=NASDAQ:AMZN">AMZN</a> shareholders think so, too.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sbolen.me/2008/05/15/why-the-kindle-will-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: sbolen.me @ 2012-02-09 05:37:28 -->
