The worst mea culpa I've ever seen

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: social media director (Kurt Greenbaum) at a major newspaper (St. Louis Post-Dispatch) blatantly violates own Privacy Policy (using IP address for non-stated purpose) after being offended by a lewd word (“pussy”) posted anonymously, turns over information to the anonymous commentor’s employer (school district), and when confronted by his employer, the employee (anonymous commentor) resigns.

If you need to get up to speed, read this.

Greenbaum’s mea culpa is priceless. He goes on and on about how he’s not wrong and doesn’t really feel bad for his actions.

Shorter version: “Even though someone lost their job over posting the word ‘pussy’ anonymously, I feel no remorse because I believe I technically didn’t do anything wrong, and I don’t believe I went too far.”

What really gets my goat is that in the justification, Greenbaum goes so far as to say “We don’t condone vulgarity or obscenity on our site. We won’t tolerate it. Increasingly, we are concerned about the tone of the conversation on STLtoday. When we can, we ban people without apology for bad behavior. We have taken steps to beef up our review process and we’ll continue to enhance those measures to address bad language and intolerant speech.”

You don’t have to go far to find intolerant speech on the Post-Dispatch web site. In fact, do a search for “School Bus” (the incident where two African-American kids beat up a Caucasian kid on a school bus) or “Obama” (our 44th President, who happens to be black), and you’ll see the type of comments that are all-too common. Here are just two (in succession, from the same story):

STL Today Comments

But I digress.

So, in the worst mea culpa I’ve ever seen, Greenbaum says that this is a good teachable moment.

I’ll bite.

Here are 3 bulletproof ways to ensure that this never happens again:

  1. Read up on social media ethics. Draft a policy. Make sure those in your social media team understand it.
    By deciding to take matters in your own hand – offended by the word pussy, ironically enough – you violated some pretty hardcore transparency guidelines when you went around your Terms of Service.
  2. Install some WordPress plugins to Moderate Comments.
    This is the biggest facepalm in the entire debacle. The blogs on STLToday.com all run WordPress. There are ways to, uh, moderate comments with profanity filters, IP range bans, et cetera. Please don’t plead ignorance – anyone worth their spit in social media has had run-ins with WordPress, and thereby knows about plugins.
  3. Enlist the help of the community to help purge unsavory comments.
    You’d be surprised how many people would volunteer to help out if it meant cleaning up the community. Empower them. Since you’re using WordPress, it’s super easy to set up roles. (Just sayin’)

What suggestions do you have to help clean up the mess at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch? Let’s hear ‘em in the comments.

EDIT: I’ve had numerous people tell me things like “I know Kurt – he’s a good guy.” I’m sure he is, but that doesn’t change the fact that he went too far, and now someone is out of work in a recession.

20 Comments Short URL , , , , , ,
  • http://toddrjordan.com/thebroadbrush tojosan

    Glad you shared this with me. I know it's like people to pile on but there' s nothing untrue here. Kurt is a decent guy. He works hard. He tries hard. He messed up here.

  • KBestOliver

    This is a great post. It's interesting to me that the P-D seems to be laying people off left and right and they're still keeping someone who made a ridiculously egregious error in their supposed area of expertise.

    The whole thing makes me want to read the P-D even less, which I did not think was possible.

  • http://sbolen.me/ Stephen Bolen

    Thanks for your comments, Todd. :)

    I'm sure Kurt is a good guy and quite savvy at what he does, but he really went over the line when he skirted what I would consider to be common sense ethics.

    If you're going to bust someone's chops and go so far as to look up their IP address and submit it to the poster's place of employment and not do the same for the racist bile that's being spewed all over the P-D website, there's something seriously wrong.

  • http://sbolen.me/ Stephen Bolen

    I really think the community moderation would be a good move – I'd certainly read more items if I knew I didn't have to wade south of the Mason Dixon/Common Sense & Decency line to find out what people thought of certain news items.

    Outdated business models should be the least of the dead tree newspaper's worries. This kind of stuff travels faster and has much wider circulation.

  • http://twitter.com/elsicomoro Terry Blastenbrei

    Apparently someone posted Greenbaum's personal info on another site. Totally not cool, but when you piss people off…

  • JSpaghetti

    I love it when, in lieu of complaining, someone makes realistic suggestions on how to fix a problem. You've done exactly that. Excellent post.

    I'm also glad that you were sure to mention the guy resigned. It's driving me crazy to read “he was fired”. I really hope the guy talks to the RFT. I'd love to hear his side of the story because it seems so cut and dry, “Hey, Joe, did you post the word 'pussy' on STLtoday – twice?” And then he just hands over a resignation letter. There has to be more to it.

  • http://sbolen.me/ Stephen Bolen

    I think posting Greenbaum's personal information went a bit too far…

    But, then again, my information is out there for the world to see, so you do assume some risk.

    (PS – don't post my information anywhere! LOL)

  • http://sbolen.me/ Stephen Bolen

    I agree – there's gotta be way more there than “Yo! The Post-Dispatch says that you posted the word 'pussy' on their blog – is this true?”

    “I resign.”

    Also, thanks for the comment. I'm just tryin' to be helpful with some suggestions. Hopefully the STLToday.com folks take some of it seriously and act on their desire to actually clean up the community's comments on the site.

  • http://toddrjordan.com/thebroadbrush tojosan

    Glad you shared this with me. I know it’s like people to pile on but there’ s nothing untrue here. Kurt is a decent guy. He works hard. He tries hard. He messed up here.

    • http://sbolen.me/ Stephen Bolen

      Thanks for your comments, Todd. :)

      I’m sure Kurt is a good guy and quite savvy at what he does, but he really went over the line when he skirted what I would consider to be common sense ethics.

      If you’re going to bust someone’s chops and go so far as to look up their IP address and submit it to the poster’s place of employment and not do the same for the racist bile that’s being spewed all over the P-D website, there’s something seriously wrong.

      • http://www.WeAreSpoke.com creativereason

        I’ve heard others say what a great guy Kurt is as well and I’m sure that is true. However, as Stephen mentioned above (and as we were tweeting back and forth about in the aftermath of his non-mea-culpa), now that we all know it’s a wordpress engine powering the comments, there is ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE FOR NOT FIXING THE PERSISTENT COMMENT PROBLEMS on stltoday.com.

        This is a failure to do a job (if we believe there claims that they are doing their best to fix the comments). There are hundreds of commenting plugins / tools out there like DISQUS that are better than the joke of a system stltoday.com is using now.

        Kurt shouldn’t have contacted the school, but by now that point has been proved ad naseum. But my bigger concern is was he or whoever administers the site qualified to have the job in the first place? How they haven’t fixed this problem prior to know is a joke. Kurt’s response to this one vulgar post just exacerbates the existing problems with the site. Someone at STLToday needs to acknowledge this is a problem and make some steps to fix their problems or they are going to lose a ton of readership / views when the Globe site launches.

  • Anonymous

    This is a great post. It’s interesting to me that the P-D seems to be laying people off left and right and they’re still keeping someone who made a ridiculously egregious error in their supposed area of expertise.

    The whole thing makes me want to read the P-D even less, which I did not think was possible.

    • http://sbolen.me/ Stephen Bolen

      I really think the community moderation would be a good move – I’d certainly read more items if I knew I didn’t have to wade south of the Mason Dixon/Common Sense & Decency line to find out what people thought of certain news items.

      Outdated business models should be the least of the dead tree newspaper’s worries. This kind of stuff travels faster and has much wider circulation.

  • Pingback: Kurt Greenbaum takes out a commenter | The Broad Brush

  • http://twitter.com/elsicomoro Terry Blastenbrei

    Apparently someone posted Greenbaum’s personal info on another site. Totally not cool, but when you piss people off…

    • http://sbolen.me/ Stephen Bolen

      I think posting Greenbaum’s personal information went a bit too far…

      But, then again, my information is out there for the world to see, so you do assume some risk.

      (PS – don’t post my information anywhere! LOL)

  • Anonymous

    I love it when, in lieu of complaining, someone makes realistic suggestions on how to fix a problem. You’ve done exactly that. Excellent post.

    I’m also glad that you were sure to mention the guy resigned. It’s driving me crazy to read “he was fired”. I really hope the guy talks to the RFT. I’d love to hear his side of the story because it seems so cut and dry, “Hey, Joe, did you post the word ‘pussy’ on STLtoday – twice?” And then he just hands over a resignation letter. There has to be more to it.

    • http://sbolen.me/ Stephen Bolen

      I agree – there’s gotta be way more there than “Yo! The Post-Dispatch says that you posted the word ‘pussy’ on their blog – is this true?”

      “I resign.”

      Also, thanks for the comment. I’m just tryin’ to be helpful with some suggestions. Hopefully the STLToday.com folks take some of it seriously and act on their desire to actually clean up the community’s comments on the site.

  • http://twitter.com/creativereason Brian Schwartz

    I've heard others say what a great guy Kurt is as well and I'm sure that is true. However, as Stephen mentioned above (and as we were tweeting back and forth about in the aftermath of his non-mea-culpa), now that we all know it's a wordpress engine powering the comments, there is ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE FOR NOT FIXING THE PERSISTENT COMMENT PROBLEMS on stltoday.com.

    This is a failure to do a job (if we believe there claims that they are doing their best to fix the comments). There are hundreds of commenting plugins / tools out there like DISQUS that are better than the joke of a system stltoday.com is using now.

    Kurt shouldn't have contacted the school, but by now that point has been proved ad naseum. But my bigger concern is was he or whoever administers the site qualified to have the job in the first place? How they haven't fixed this problem prior to know is a joke. Kurt's response to this one vulgar post just exacerbates the existing problems with the site. Someone at STLToday needs to acknowledge this is a problem and make some steps to fix their problems or they are going to lose a ton of readership / views when the Globe site launches.

  • http://www.WeAreSpoke.com creativereason

    I've heard others say what a great guy Kurt is as well and I'm sure that is true. However, as Stephen mentioned above (and as we were tweeting back and forth about in the aftermath of his non-mea-culpa), now that we all know it's a wordpress engine powering the comments, there is ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE FOR NOT FIXING THE PERSISTENT COMMENT PROBLEMS on stltoday.com.

    This is a failure to do a job (if we believe there claims that they are doing their best to fix the comments). There are hundreds of commenting plugins / tools out there like DISQUS that are better than the joke of a system stltoday.com is using now.

    Kurt shouldn't have contacted the school, but by now that point has been proved ad naseum. But my bigger concern is was he or whoever administers the site qualified to have the job in the first place? How they haven't fixed this problem prior to know is a joke. Kurt's response to this one vulgar post just exacerbates the existing problems with the site. Someone at STLToday needs to acknowledge this is a problem and make some steps to fix their problems or they are going to lose a ton of readership / views when the Globe site launches.